Stiffness Type
The app calculates the deformation of the mesh by solving a linear elasticity problem. The quality of the deformed mesh depends largely on the relative stiffness distribution of the mesh elements. In general, assigning a higher stiffness to the elements located near the moving parts provides optimal results; the stiffer elements tend to maintain their original shape, while the less stiff elements absorb most of the deformation.
There are three methods for calculating the stiffness distribution: inverse distance, inverse volume, and uniform.
Inverse Distance
The inverse distance approach automatically assigns a higher stiffness to the elements close to the moving boundaries; that is, the boundaries where a moving wall condition or a fluid-structure interaction interface has been applied. If neither of these conditions have been applied, the app uses uniform stiffness. In the inverse distance approach, the stiffness, , of a cell is computed as follows:
where
- is the stiffness scale,
- is the distance from the cell center of the cell to the closest point of the moving boundaries,
- is the distance to the moving boundaries of the closest cell,
- is the stiffness variation distance, and
- is a power coefficient.
Inverse Volume
The inverse volume approach assigns higher relative stiffness to the smallest elements in the mesh. In general, meshes tend to have smaller elements close to walls to resolve the boundary layers. Therefore, the inverse volume approach improves the quality of the deformed mesh in those areas. In the inverse volume approach, the stiffness, , of a cell is computed as:
where
- is the stiffness scale,
- is the volume of the cell,
- is the volume of the smallest cell,
- is the stiffness variation volume, and
- is a power coefficient.
Uniform
The uniform distribution approach may be useful for applications such as pistons, where the whole computational domain expands and contracts in a uniform manner.