The porous metal plasticity material option:
- is based on Gurson's porous metal plasticity theory with void nucleation and
strain-dependent hardening and strain-rate dependence of the matrix;
- can only have isotropic hardening as it deforms plastically;
- is well-tuned for tensile applications, such as fracture studies with void coalescence,
but it is also useful for compressive cases where the material densifies, and;
- defines the inelastic flow of the porous metal on the basis of a potential function that
characterizes the porosity in terms of a single state variable, the relative density.
Porous Metal Plasticity
You specify the elastic part of the response separately; only linear isotropic elasticity
can be specified (see Introduction to Linear Elasticity). The porous
metal plasticity model cannot be used in conjunction with porous elasticity.
You specify the hardening behavior of the fully dense matrix material by defining a metal
plasticity model. Only isotropic hardening can be specified (see Plastic Options). The hardening curve must describe the
yield stress of the matrix material as a function of plastic strain in the matrix material.
In defining this dependence at finite strains, “true” (Cauchy) stress and log strain values
should be given. Rate dependency effects for the matrix material can be modeled.
The relative density of a material,
, is defined as the ratio of the volume of solid material to the total
volume of the material. The relationships defining the model are expressed in terms of the
void volume fraction,
, which is defined as the ratio of the volume of voids to the total volume
of the material. It follows that
.
Input Data |
Description |
Relative density value |
Initial relative density value,
. |
The yield condition is
where
is the deviatoric stress,
is the von Mises stress,
is the pressure stress,
is the yield stress of the fully dense matrix material as a function of
the equivalent plastic strain in the matrix,
, and
are material parameters. For typical metals the ranges of the parameters
reported in the literature are
to
,
,
to
. The original Gurson model is recovered when
.
Void Nucleation
The total change in void volume fraction,
, is given as
where
is change due to growth of existing voids and
is change due to nucleation of new voids. Growth of the existing voids is
based on the law of conservation of mass and is expressed in terms of the void volume
fraction:
The nucleation of voids is given by a strain-controlled relationship:
where
The normal distribution of the nucleation strain has a mean value
and standard deviation
.
is the volume fraction of the nucleated voids, and voids are nucleated
only in tension.
The nucleation function
is assumed to have a normal distribution for different values of the
standard deviation
.
The following ranges of values are reported in the literature for typical metals:
to
,
to
, and
. You specify these parameters, which can be defined as tabular functions
of temperature and predefined field variables.
Porous Failure Criteria
The porous metal plasticity model in an explicit analysis allows for failure. In this case
the yield condition is written as
where the function
models the rapid loss of stress carrying capacity that accompanies void
coalescence. This function is defined in terms of the void volume fraction:
where
In the above relationship
is a critical value of the void volume fraction, and
is the value of void volume fraction at which there is a complete loss of
stress carrying capacity in the material. The parameters
and
model the material failure when
, due to mechanisms such as micro fracture and void coalescence. When
, total failure at the material point occurs. An element is deleted (or
removed) from a mesh upon material failure.
Input Data |
Description |
Void Volume Fraction at Total
Failure |
Void volume fraction at total failure,
. |
Critical Void Volume Fraction |
Critical void volume fraction (threshold of rapid loss of stress
carrying capacity),
. |