Crushable foam models:
Crushable Foam PlasticityOnly linear isotropic elasticity can be used. For the plastic part of the behavior, the yield surface is a von Mises circle in the deviatoric stress plane and an ellipse in the meridional stress plane. Two hardening models are available: the volumetric hardening model, where the point on the yield ellipse in the meridional plane that represents hydrostatic tension loading is fixed and the evolution of the yield surface is driven by the volumetric compacting plastic strain, and the isotropic hardening model, where the yield ellipse is centered at the origin in the stress plane and evolves in a geometrically self-similar manner. The hardening curve must describe the uniaxial compression yield stress as a function of the corresponding plastic strain. In defining this dependence at finite strains, “true” (Cauchy) stress and logarithmic strain values must be given. Both models predict similar behavior for compression-dominated loading. However, for hydrostatic tension loading the volumetric hardening model assumes a perfectly plastic behavior, while the isotropic hardening model predicts the same behavior in both hydrostatic tension and hydrostatic compression.
Crushable Foam HardeningThe yield surface for volumetric hardening is defined as where is the pressure stress, is the von Mises stress, is the deviatoric stress, is the size of the -axis of the yield ellipse, is the size of the (vertical) -axis of the yield ellipse, is the shape factor of the yield ellipse that defines the relative magnitude of the axes, is the center of the yield ellipse on the -axis, is the strength of the material in hydrostatic tension, and is the yield stress in hydrostatic compression. If volumetric hardening is chosen, the yield surface intersects the -axis at and . We assume that remains fixed throughout any plastic deformation process. By contrast, the compressive strength, , evolves as a result of compaction (increase in density) or dilation (reduction in density) of the material. The evolution of the yield surface can be expressed through the evolution of the yield surface size on the hydrostatic stress axis, , as a function of the value of volumetric compacting plastic strain, . Assuming that is constant and that in uniaxial compression, the compressive strength ( ) can be written as a function of uniaxial compression, : Thus, you provide input to the hardening law by specifying, in the usual tabular form, only the value of the yield stress in uniaxial compression as a function of the absolute value of the axial plastic strain. The table must start with a zero plastic strain (corresponding to the virgin state of the material), and the tabular entries must be given in ascending magnitude of . If required, the yield stress can also be a function of temperature and other predefined field variables. In this case, the model requires that the values of the strength ratios and be also specified for the same values of temperature and predefined field variables. The yield surface for isotropic hardening is defined as where is the pressure stress, is the von Mises stress, is the deviatoric stress, is the size of the -axis of the yield ellipse, is the size of the (vertical) -axis of the yield ellipse, is the shape factor of the yield ellipse that defines the relative magnitude of the axes, is the yield stress in hydrostatic compression, and is the absolute value of the yield stress in uniaxial compression. If isotropic hardening is chosen, a simple uniaxial compression test is sufficient to define the evolution of the yield surface. The hardening law defines the value of the yield stress in uniaxial compression as a function of the absolute value of the axial plastic strain. The piecewise linear relationship is entered in tabular form. The table must start with a zero plastic strain (corresponding to the virgin state of the materials), and the tabular entries must be given in ascending magnitude of . For values of plastic strain greater than the last user-specified value, the stress-strain relationship is extrapolated based on the last slope computed from the data.
|