Beam/gap example

This example verifies the performance of a gap element in a simple case.

This page discusses:

ProductsAbaqus/Standard

Three parallel cantilever beams are initially separate but have possible contact points in five locations, as shown in Figure 1. A pair of pinching loads is applied, as shown. Only small displacements are considered, so each beam responds in pure bending. The problem is entirely linear, except for the switching contact conditions.

The sequence of events is readily imagined:

  1. The top and bottom beams bend as the pinching forces are applied, and the first contact occurs when the tip of the top beam hits the tip of the middle beam (gap 3 closes). Up to this point the problem is symmetric about the middle beam, but it now loses that symmetry.

  2. Subsequent to this initial contact, the top and middle beams bend down and the bottom beam continues to bend up until contact occurs at gap 5.

  3. As the load continues to increase, gap 2 closes.

  4. Next, gap 3 opens as the support provided to the top beam by gap 2 causes the outboard part of the top beam to reverse its direction of rotation. At this point (when gap 3 opens), the solution becomes symmetric about the middle beam once again.

  5. Finally, as the pinching loads increase further, gaps 1 and 4 also close. From this point on the contact conditions do not switch, no matter how much more load is applied.

Problem description

Each cantilever is modeled using five cubic beam elements of type B23. Initially all gaps are open, with an initial gap clearance of 0.01. The pinching loads are increased monotonically from 0 to 200. The beam lengths, modulus, and cross-section are shown in Figure 1. (The units of dimension and force are consistent but not physical.)

The loads are applied in 10 equal increments, with the increment size given directly in the static analysis.

Results and discussion

The solution is summarized in Table 1.

Tables

Table 1. Beam/gap example: solution summary.
Increment Pinching Force in gap
force, P 1 2 3 4 5
1 20 Open 6.5 0.732 Open 7.97
2 40 Open 18.3 Open Open 18.3
3 60 Open 28.7 Open Open 28.7
4 80 Open 39.1 Open Open 39.1
5 100 Open 49.5 Open Open 49.5
6 120 Open 59.8 Open Open 59.8
7 140 10.7 68.6 Open 10.7 68.6
8 160 31.6 75.9 Open 31.6 75.9
9 180 52.5 83.2 Open 52.5 83.2
10 200 73.4 90.4 Open 73.4 90.4

Figures

Figure 1. Beam/gap example.