The soft rock plasticity model provided in
Abaqus:
is intended to model the mechanical response of soft rock and weakly
consolidated sands;
describes the inelastic behavior of the material by an isotropic yield
function that depends on the three stress invariants, a non-associated flow
assumption to define the plastic strain rate, and a strain hardening theory
that changes the size of the yield surface according to the inelastic
volumetric strain;
is based on the constitutive model proposed by Crook et al. (2006);
requires that the elastic part of the deformation be defined by using
the isotropic linear elastic material model (Linear Elastic Behavior)
or, in
Abaqus/Standard,
the power-law based porous elastic material model (Elastic Behavior of Porous Materials)
within the same material definition;
captures the transition of the yield surface in the
-plane
from a rounded-triangular shape to a circular shape with an increase in
pressure;
allows for the hardening law to be defined by a piecewise linear form;
may optionally include hardening in hydrostatic tension; and
can be used in conjunction with a regularization scheme for mitigating
mesh dependence in situations where the material exhibits strain localization
with increasing plastic deformation.
The model is based on the yield surface (Figure 1)
where
is the equivalent pressure stress;
is the Mises equivalent stress;
is the yield stress in hydrostatic compression;
is the initial value of ;
is the yield stress in hydrostatic tension;
is the friction angle;
is the material parameter that controls the shape of the yield surface in
the -
plane (Figure 1);
and
is the eccentricity parameter.
captures the transition of the yield surface in the -plane
from a rounded-triangular shape to a circular shape with an increase in
pressure and is defined as follows (Figure 2):
where
is the third stress invariant; and ,
,
and
are material parameters.
Abaqus
requires that the function
should satisfy the following conditions to ensure that the yield surface
remains convex (Bigoni and Piccolroaz, 2004).
Plastic Flow
Plastic flow is based on a nonassociated rule with iso-surfaces of the flow
potential being used for the calculation of plastic strain rate. The flow
potential surface is defined by the following function:
where
is the dilation angle and all other constants are same as in the expression for
the yield surface.
Nonassociated Flow
Nonassociated flow implies that the material stiffness matrix is not
symmetric and the unsymmetric matrix storage and solution scheme should be used
in
Abaqus/Standard (see
Defining an Analysis).
If the region of the model in which nonassociated inelastic deformation is
occurring is confined, it is possible that a symmetric approximation to the
material stiffness matrix will give an acceptable rate of convergence; in such
cases the unsymmetric matrix scheme may not be needed.
Eccentricity
The eccentricity parameter, ,
is used to ensure uniqueness of the plastic flow at
=
and
= .
The flow potential tends to a straight line as the eccentricity tends to zero
(Figure 3).
The default value is 0.001.
Hardening Law
The hardening law has a piecewise linear form. The user-defined relationship
relates the yield stress in hydrostatic compression, ,
and, optionally, the yield stress in hydrostatic tension,
,
to the corresponding volumetric plastic strain,
(Figure 4):
The volumetric plastic strain axis has an arbitrary origin:
is the position on this axis corresponding to the initial state of the
material, thus defining the initial hydrostatic pressure in compression,
,
and, optionally, in tension, .
This relationship is defined in tabular form as soft rock hardening data. The
range of values for which
and
are defined should be sufficient to include all values of equivalent pressure
stress to which the material will be subjected during the analysis. Data for
must be specified; data for
is optional.
Softening Regularization
Granular materials often exhibit strain localization with increasing plastic
deformation. Post-failure solutions from conventional finite element methods
can be strongly mesh dependent. To mitigate the mesh dependency of the
solutions, a regularization method is often used to introduce a
micro-structural length scale into the constitutive formulation. Let
denote the characteristic width of a shear band or a crack band,
denote the characteristic length of the element, and
denote the inelastic strain for the element. Then the inelastic strain in the
localization band, ,
is defined to be
where
is a material parameter and
is a positive number used for bounding the magnitude of regularization. This
strain regularization method is valid only when the characteristic length of
the element is greater than the width of the localization band; i.e.,
.
If softening regularization is included, it is applied to all hardening data
(tension and compression) by default. You can optionally turn off softening
regularization for a specific type of hardening.
Initial Conditions
If an initial stress at a point is given (see Defining Initial Stresses) such that the stress point lies outside the initially defined yield surface, Abaqus will try to adjust the initial position of the surface to make the stress point lie on it
and issue a warning. However, if the yield stress in hydrostatic tension, , is zero and does not evolve with volumetric plastic strain and the stress
point is such that the equivalent pressure stress, p, is negative, Abaqus issues an error message and execution is terminated.
The initial condition on volumetric plastic strain, , can be defined in the definition of the soft rock plasticity model. Abaqus also allows a general method of specifying the initial plastic strain field on elements
(see Defining Initial Values of Plastic Strain). The volumetric plastic strain is then calculated as
Elements
The soft rock plasticity model can be used with plane strain, generalized
plane strain, axisymmetric, and three-dimensional solid (continuum) elements in
Abaqus.
This model cannot be used with elements for which the assumed stress state is
plane stress (plane stress, shell, and membrane elements).
Bigoni, D., and A.
Piccolroaz,
"Yield Criteria for Quasibrittle and Frictional
Materials," International Journal of
Solids and Structures, 41, 2855–2878, 2004.
Crook, T., S.
M.
Willson, J.G. Yu, and D.R.J. Owen,
"Predictive Modeling of Structure Evolution in Sandbox
Experiments," Journal of Structural
Geology, 28, pp. 729,
2006.