Johnson-Cook plasticity

This problem contains basic test cases for one or more Abaqus elements and features.

This page discusses:

ProductsAbaqus/StandardAbaqus/Explicit

Elements tested

T2D2

T3D2

B21

B31

SAX1

C3D8R

CPE4R

CPS4R

CAX4R

S4R

S4RS

S4RSW

M3D4R

Features tested

Johnson-Cook plasticity model.

Problem description

This verification problem tests single-element models that are run under simple loading conditions (uniaxial tension, uniaxial compression, and simple shear). The purpose of this example is to test the Johnson-Cook plasticity model by comparing it to the Mises plasticity model with equivalent plastic hardening. Figure 1 shows the 26 elements used in the analysis in their original shapes. The elements in the top row are modeled using the Johnson-Cook material model; the elements in the bottom row are modeled using the Mises plasticity model with an equivalent hardening curve. The elastic material properties are Young's modulus = 124 GPa and Poisson's ratio = 0.34. The plastic hardening is chosen to be

σ¯=90+292(ε¯pl)0.31,

where σ¯ is the yield stress (unit in MPa) and ε¯pl is the equivalent plastic strain. The material properties are those of OFHC copper as reported by Johnson and Cook (1985). A plot of σ¯ versus ε¯pl is shown in Figure 2.

Results and discussion

Results obtained by using the Johnson-Cook material model are smoother than corresponding results obtained by using the Mises plasticity model. The Johnson-Cook model has an analytical expression for the nonlinear hardening curve; whereas the hardening curve for Mises plasticity model is linear between input data points, as shown in Figure 2. Figure 3 shows the comparison of the stress-strain responses obtained with the Johnson-Cook and the Mises plasticity models using the C3D8R element under uniaxial tension; Figure 4 shows the comparison of the stress-strain responses obtained with the Johnson-Cook and the Mises plasticity models using the CPE4R element under uniaxial compression; Figure 5 shows the comparison of the stress-strain responses obtained with the Johnson-Cook and the Mises plasticity models using the CPE4R element under simple shear.

Input files

Abaqus/Standard input files

johnsoncook_s.inp

Uniaxial tension test.

johnsoncookinit_pre_s.inp

Uniaxial compression test, nonzero initial conditions for ε¯pl.

Abaqus/Explicit input files

johnsoncook.inp

Uniaxial tension test.

johnsoncook_pre.inp

Uniaxial compression test.

johnsoncook_shr.inp

Simple shear test.

johnsoncookinit.inp

Uniaxial tension test, nonzero initial conditions for ε¯pl.

johnsoncookinit_pre.inp

Uniaxial compression test, nonzero initial conditions for ε¯pl.

johnsoncookinit_shr.inp

Simple shear test, nonzero initial conditions for ε¯pl.

References

  1. Johnson, G. R., and W. H. Cook, Fracture Characteristics of Three Metals Subjected to Various Strains, Strain rates, Temperatures and Pressures, Engineering Fracture Mechanics, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 31–48, 1985.

Figures

Figure 1. Johnson-Cook plasticity test cases.

Figure 2. Hardening curve: yield stress versus equivalent plastic strain.

Figure 3. Uniaxial tension comparison (C3D8R element).

Figure 4. Uniaxial compression comparison (CPE4R element).

Figure 5. Simple shear comparison (CPE4R element).