Linear kinematics element tests

This problem contains basic test cases for one or more Abaqus elements and features.

This page discusses:

ProductsAbaqus/Explicit

Elements tested

B21

B22

B31

B32

C3D8

C3D8I

C3D8R

CPE4R

CPS4R

CAX4R

M3D4R

PIPE21

PIPE31

S4

S4R

S4RS

S4RSW

SAX1

T2D2

T3D2

Features tested

The small-displacement deformation theory.

Problem description

This verification test consists of a set of single-element models for each element type in analyses that use the small-displacement theory. All degrees of freedom are prescribed so that the results do not include any dynamic effects. Each element is subjected to all applicable fundamental modes of deformation. The total strains are large to show that the results are linear and remain unaffected by changes to the element's current configuration.

The material is linear elastic with a Young's modulus of 1.0 × 105, Poisson's ratio of .33, and density of 1000.

Results and discussion

All element types tested yield the appropriate results for their applicable fundamental modes of deformation. Results for the two-dimensional truss element are illustrated here.

There are two global modes of deformation for a two-dimensional truss: longitudinal and lateral. The longitudinal mode is driven by fixing one end of the truss and prescribing a longitudinal displacement at the other. The axial stresses in the truss element as a result of longitudinal deformation for both small-displacement theory (geometric nonlinearities are neglected) and large-displacement theory (geometric nonlinearities are considered in the step) are shown in Figure 1. As the strains become large, the results diverge because the large-displacement theory accounts for the thinning of the truss as it stretches. The global lateral mode is invoked by prescribing a lateral displacement at one end of the truss element while holding all other degrees of freedom fixed. Results for the lateral case are shown in Figure 2. The nonlinear geometric effect is accounted for only in the large-displacement analysis. The small-displacement analysis ignores the extension of the truss due to its rotation and, therefore, sees no extensional strain due to the prescribed lateral displacements.

Input files

lk_b21.inp

B21 elements.

lk_b22.inp

B22 elements.

lk_b31.inp

B31 elements.

lk_b32.inp

B32 elements.

lk_p21.inp

PIPE21 elements.

lk_p31.inp

PIPE31 elements.

lk_c3d8.inp

C3D8 elements.

lk_c3d8i.inp

C3D8I elements.

lk_c3d8_orient.inp

C3D8 elements with ORIENTATION.

lk_c3d8i_orient.inp

C3D8I elements with ORIENTATION.

lk_c3d8r.inp

C3D8R elements.

lk_c3d8r_orient.inp

C3D8R elements with ORIENTATION.

lk_cax4r.inp

CAX4R elements.

lk_cax4r_orient.inp

CAX4R elements with ORIENTATION.

lk_cpe4r.inp

CPE4R elements.

lk_cpe4r_orient.inp

CPE4R elements with ORIENTATION.

lk_cps4r.inp

CPS4R elements.

lk_cps4r_orient.inp

CPS4R elements with ORIENTATION.

lk_dashpota.inp

Dashpot elements.

lk_m3d4r.inp

M3D4R elements.

lk_m3d4r_orient.inp

M3D4R elements with ORIENTATION.

lk_s4.inp

S4 elements.

lk_s4_orient.inp

S4 elements with ORIENTATION.

lk_s4r.inp

S4R elements.

lk_s4r_orient.inp

S4R elements with ORIENTATION.

lk_s4r_gs.inp

S4R elements with SHELL GENERAL SECTION.

lk_s4r_gs_orient.inp

S4R elements with SHELL GENERAL SECTION and ORIENTATION.

lk_s4rs.inp

S4RS elements.

lk_s4rs_orient.inp

S4RS elements with ORIENTATION.

lk_s4rs_gs.inp

S4RS elements with SHELL GENERAL SECTION.

lk_s4rs_gs_orient.inp

S4RS elements with SHELL GENERAL SECTION and ORIENTATION.

lk_s4rsw.inp

S4RSW elements.

lk_s4rsw_orient.inp

S4RSW elements with ORIENTATION.

lk_s4rsw_gs.inp

S4RSW elements with SHELL GENERAL SECTION.

lk_s4rsw_gs_orient.inp

S4RSW elements with SHELL GENERAL SECTION and ORIENTATION.

lk_sax1.inp

SAX1 elements.

lk_sax1_gs.inp

SAX1 elements with SHELL GENERAL SECTION.

lk_springa.inp

Spring elements.

lk_t2d2.inp

Two-dimensional truss elements.

lk_t3d2.inp

Three-dimensional truss elements.

Figures

Figure 1. Axial stress comparison for the extensional mode.

Figure 2. Axial stress comparison for the shear mode.