An analysis step during which the response can be either linear or
nonlinear is called a general analysis step. An
analysis step during which you activate a perturbation procedure that
determines the response about a base state due to perturbation loads and
boundary conditions is called a linear
perturbation analysis step. General analysis steps can be
included in an
Abaqus/Standard
or
Abaqus/Explicit
analysis; linear perturbation analysis steps are available only in
Abaqus/Standard.
A clear distinction is made in
Abaqus/Standard
between general analysis and linear perturbation analysis steps. Loading
conditions are defined differently for the two cases, time measures are
different, and the results should be interpreted differently. These
distinctions are defined in this section.
Abaqus/Standard treats a perturbation analysis as a perturbation about a preloaded, predeformed state. Abaqus/Foundation, a subset of Abaqus/Standard, is limited entirely to perturbation analysis but does not allow preloading or predeformed
states. You cannot run an Abaqus/Foundation analysis in a restart job.
A general analysis step is one in which the effects of any nonlinearities
present in the model can be included. The starting condition for each general
step is the ending condition from the last general step, with the state of the
model evolving throughout the history of general analysis steps as it responds
to the history of loading. If the first step of the analysis is a general step,
the initial conditions for the step can be specified directly (Initial Conditions).
Abaqus
always considers total time to increase throughout
a general analysis. Each step also has its own step
time, which begins at zero in each step. If the analysis
procedure for the step has a physical time scale, as in a dynamic analysis,
step time must correspond to that physical time. Otherwise, step time is any
convenient time scale—for example, 0.0 to 1.0—for the step. The step times of
all general analysis steps accumulate into total time. Therefore, if an option
such as creep (available only in
Abaqus/Standard)
whose formulation depends on total time is used in a multistep analysis, any
steps that do not have a physical time scale should have a negligibly small
step time compared to the steps in which a physical time scale does exist.
Sources of Nonlinearity
Nonlinear stress analysis problems can contain up to three sources of
nonlinearity: material nonlinearity, geometric nonlinearity, and boundary
nonlinearity.
Material Nonlinearity
Abaqus
offers models for a wide range of nonlinear material behaviors (see
Combining Material Behaviors).
Many of the materials are history dependent: the material's response at any
time depends on what has happened to it at previous times. Thus, the solution
must be obtained by following the actual loading sequence. The general analysis
procedures are designed with this in view.
Geometric Nonlinearity
It is possible in
Abaqus
to define a problem as a “small-displacement” analysis, which means that
geometric nonlinearity is ignored in the element calculations—the kinematic
relationships are linearized. By default, large displacements and rotations are
accounted for in contact constraints even if the small-displacement element
formulations are used for the analysis; i.e., a large-sliding contact tracking
algorithm is used (see
Contact Formulations in Abaqus/Standard
and
Contact Formulations for Contact Pairs in Abaqus/Explicit).
The elements in a small-displacement analysis are formulated in the reference
(original) configuration, using original nodal coordinates. The errors in such
an approximation are of the order of the strains and rotations compared to
unity. The approximation also eliminates any possibility of capturing
bifurcation buckling, which is sometimes a critical aspect of a structure's
response (see
Unstable Collapse and Postbuckling Analysis).
You must consider these issues when interpreting the results of such an
analysis.
The alternative to a “small-displacement” analysis in
Abaqus
is to include large-displacement effects. In this case most elements are
formulated in the current configuration using current nodal positions. Elements
therefore distort from their original shapes as the deformation increases. With
sufficiently large deformations, the elements may become so distorted that they
are no longer suitable for use; for example, the volume of the element at an
integration point may become negative. In this situation
Abaqus
will issue a warning message indicating the problem. In addition,
Abaqus/Standard
will cut back the time increment before making further attempts to continue the
solution.
Abaqus/Explicit
also offers element failure models to allow elements that reach high strains to
be removed from a model; see
Dynamic Failure Models
for details.
For each step of an analysis you specify whether a small- or
large-displacement formulation should be used (i.e., whether geometric
nonlinearity should be ignored or included). By default,
Abaqus/Standard
uses a small-displacement formulation and
Abaqus/Explicit
uses a large-displacement formulation. The default value for the formulation in
an import analysis is the same as the value at the time of import. If a
large-displacement formulation is used during any step of an analysis, it will
be used in all following steps in the analysis; there is no way to turn it off.
Almost all of the elements in
Abaqus
use a fully nonlinear formulation. The exceptions are the cubic beam elements
in
Abaqus/Standard and
the small-strain shell elements (those shell elements other than S3/S3R, S4, S4R, and the axisymmetric shells) in which the cross-sectional
thickness change is ignored so that these elements are appropriate only for
large rotations and small strains. Except for these elements, the strains and
rotations can be arbitrarily large.
The calculated stress is the “true” (Cauchy) stress. For beam, pipe, and
shell elements the stress components are given in local directions that rotate
with the material. For all other elements the stress components are given in
the global directions unless a local orientation (Orientations)
is used at a point. For small-displacement analysis the infinitesimal strain
measure is used, which is output with the strain output variable E; strain output specified with output variables LE and NE is the same as with E.
Boundary Nonlinearity
Contact problems are a common source of nonlinearity in stress
analysis—see
About Contact Interactions.
Other sources of boundary nonlinearity are nonlinear elastic springs, films,
radiation, multi-point constraints, etc.
Loading
In a general analysis step the loads must be defined as total values. The
rules for applying loads in a general, multistep analysis are defined in
About Loads.
Incrementation
The general analysis procedures in
Abaqus
offer two approaches for controlling incrementation. Automatic control is one
choice: you define the step and, in some procedures, specify certain tolerances
or error measures.
Abaqus
then automatically selects the increment size as it develops the response in
the step. Direct user control of increment size is the alternative approach,
whereby you specify the incrementation scheme. The direct approach is sometimes
useful in repetitive analyses with
Abaqus/Standard,
where you have a good “feel” for the convergence behavior of the problem. The
methods for selecting automatic or direct incrementation are discussed in the
individual procedure sections.
In nonlinear problems in
Abaqus/Standard the
challenge is always to obtain a convergent solution in the least possible
computational time. In these cases automatic control of the time increment is
usually more efficient because
Abaqus/Standard
can react to nonlinear response that you cannot predict ahead of time.
Automatic control is particularly valuable in cases where the response or load
varies widely through the step, as is often the case in diffusion-type problems
such as creep, heat transfer, and consolidation. Ultimately, automatic control
allows nonlinear problems to be run with confidence in
Abaqus/Standard without
extensive experience with the problem.
Strong nonlinearities typically do not present difficulties in
Abaqus/Explicit
because of the small time increments that are characteristic of an explicit
dynamic analysis product.
Stabilization of Unstable Problems in Abaqus/Standard
Some static problems can be naturally unstable, for a variety of reasons.
Unconstrained Rigid Body Motions
Instability may occur because unconstrained rigid body motions exist.
Abaqus/Standard
may be able to handle this type of problem with automatic viscous damping (see
Adjusting Contact Controls in Abaqus/Standard)
when rigid body motions exist during the approach of two bodies that will
eventually come into contact.
Localized Buckling Behavior or Material Instability
Linear perturbation analysis steps are available only in
Abaqus/Standard
(Abaqus/Foundation
is essentially the linear perturbation functionality in
Abaqus/Standard).
The response in a linear analysis step is the linear perturbation response
about the base state. The base state is the
current state of the model at the end of the last general analysis step prior
to the linear perturbation step. If the first step of an analysis is a
perturbation step, the base state is determined from the initial conditions
(Initial Conditions).
In
Abaqus/Foundation
the base state is always determined from the initial state of the model.
Linear perturbation analyses can be performed from time to time during a
fully nonlinear analysis by including the linear perturbation steps between the
general response steps. The linear perturbation response has no effect as the
general analysis is continued. The step time of linear perturbation steps,
which is taken arbitrarily to be a very small number, is never accumulated into
the total time. A simple example of this method is the determination of the
natural frequencies of a violin string under increasing tension (see
Vibration of a cable under tension).
The tension of the string is increased in several geometrically nonlinear
analysis steps. After each of these steps, the frequencies can be extracted in
a linear perturbation analysis step.
If geometric nonlinearity is included in the general analysis upon which a
linear perturbation study is based, stress stiffening or softening effects and
load stiffness effects (from pressure and other follower forces) are included
in the linear perturbation analysis.
Load stiffness contributions are also generated for centrifugal and Coriolis
loading. In direct steady-state dynamic analysis Coriolis loading generates an
imaginary antisymmetric matrix. This contribution is accounted for currently in
solid and truss elements only and is activated by using the unsymmetric matrix
storage and solution scheme in the step.
Linear Perturbation Procedures
The following purely linear perturbation procedures are available in
Abaqus/Standard:
Except for these procedures and the static procedure (explained below), all
other procedures can be used only in general analysis steps (in other words,
they are not available with
Abaqus/Foundation).
All linear perturbation procedures except for the complex eigenvalue extraction
procedure are available with
Abaqus/Foundation.
Static Perturbation Analysis
A static perturbation stress analysis (Static Stress Analysis)
can be conducted in
Abaqus/Standard.
Contact within Static Perturbation Analysis
Two approaches are available for handling contact in a static perturbation
analysis.
In the static linear perturbation procedure, which is the default, the
open/closed status of each contact constraint is assumed to remain as it is in
the base state. Further, points in contact (i.e., with a “closed” status) are
also assumed to be sticking if friction is present except when a velocity
differential is imposed by the motion of the reference frame or the transport
velocity. In the latter case, slipping conditions are assumed regardless of the
friction coefficient. Thus, by freezing contact status, the contact
contributions and thereby the overall governing equations are imposed to be
linear in the solution variables and result in a purely linear static
perturbation analysis.
In the special case where all contact constraints in an analysis are modeled
with the small sliding formulation and friction is absent, the non-default
LCP solution technique (see
Linear Complementarity Problem (LCP) Solution Technique for Solving Contact Problems) can
be activated. The static LCP perturbation
procedure treats contact in a nonlinear manner by allowing for contact status
changes due to applied perturbation loads and boundary conditions. As a result,
the actual set of points in contact (that can be different from base state) and
their normal contact pressure values are computed as a part of the solution
process during the perturbation analysis. The static
LCP perturbation procedure, with the exception
of nonlinearities from contact, shares its behavior with the static linear
perturbation procedure in most respects. For example, the solution from the
perturbation analysis including the (possibly) modified contact status is not
carried over to subsequent steps.
Loading and Output
Load magnitudes (including the magnitudes of prescribed boundary conditions
and predefined temperatures and fields) during a linear perturbation analysis
step are defined as the magnitudes of the load perturbations only. Likewise,
the value of any solution variable is output as the perturbation value only—the
value of the variable in the base state is not included.
Multiple Load Case Analysis
Multiple load cases can be analyzed simultaneously for static,
direct-solution steady-state dynamic and
SIM-based steady-state dynamic (including
subspace projection) linear perturbation steps. See
Multiple Load Case Analysis
for a description of this capability.
Restrictions
A linear perturbation analysis is subject to the following restrictions:
In a linear perturbation analysis, amplitude references (Amplitude Curves)
can be used to specify loads and boundary conditions as functions of frequency
(in a direct steady-state dynamic analysis) or to define loads and base motion
as functions of frequency (in frequency-domain mode-based dynamic procedures)
or as functions of time (in a transient modal dynamic analysis). If loads or
boundary conditions are specified as functions of time in a linear perturbation
analysis that has no time period (for example, in a static perturbation
analysis), the amplitude value corresponding to time=0 will be used.
A general implicit dynamic analysis (Implicit Dynamic Analysis Using Direct Integration)
cannot be interrupted to perform perturbation analyses: before performing the
perturbation analysis,
Abaqus/Standard
requires that the structure be brought into static equilibrium.
During a linear perturbation analysis step, the model's response is
defined by its linear elastic stiffness at the base state. For viscoelastic
materials the elastic moduli at the base state is evaluated as described in
Material Options
for static procedures and in
Evaluating Frequency-Dependent Material Properties
for frequency-based procedures. Plasticity and other inelastic effects are
ignored during a linear perturbation analysis step. For hyperelasticity (Hyperelastic Behavior of Rubberlike Materials)
or hypoelasticity (Hypoelastic Behavior),
the tangent elastic moduli in the base state are used. If cracking has
occurred—for example, in the concrete model (Concrete Smeared Cracking)—the
damaged elastic (secant) moduli are used.
The default behavior where the contact state is not allowed to change
applies to any linear perturbation step and not just to static linear
perturbation steps (see
Contact within Static Perturbation Analysis).
This restriction does not apply to the LCP
solution technique, which can be activated only within a static perturbation
step.